Radiation Oncology Home Page

 

General InformationClinical ResearchMedical PhysicsRadiation BiologyResidency ProgramDepartment FacultyDepartment HighlightsDepartment Newsletter

 

med_phy.gif (1227 bytes)

IMPACT OF POST-IMPLANT EDEMA ON DOSE COVERAGE IN PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY: CAN IMPLANT QUALITY BE ASSESSED ON DAY 0?
Frank M. Waterman and Adam P. Dicker
Supported in part by P30 CA 56036-03 (NCI)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Methods and Materials:
A pre-implant CT scan and 2 post-implant CT scans were obtained on 50 patients who received monotherapy I-125 prostate seed implants. These implants were peripherally loaded using an average seed strength of 0.70 mCi/seed and planned such that the prescribed isodose line (150 Gy-TG 43) was typically 5 mm outside the gland. The first post-implant CT scan was obtained on the day of the implant; the second typically 34 to 48 days later (mean: 46 + 23 days; range 27–135 days). A dose-volume-histogram (DVH) of the prostate was compiled from each CT study. Mean values of D90 (the dose which encompasses 90% of the prostate volume), D80, D50, and D25 were computed and used to define mean DVHs for day 0 and day 46. A mean DVH was similarly compiled from the pre-plan DVHs for comparison.

Purpose | Materials and Methods | Results | Conclusions
Medical Physics Home


Deparment Home Page | General Information | Clinical Research | Medical Physics | Radiation Biology | Residency Program |
Department Faculty | Department Highlights | Department News

smlog.gif (9272 bytes)

PLEASE NOTE:
The Kimmel Cancer Center Web site, its content and programs, is provided for informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice, nor is it intended to create any physician-patient relationship. Please remember that this information should not substitute for a visit or consultation with a health care provider. The views or opinions expressed in the resources provided do not necessarily reflect those of Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, or the Jefferson Health System or staff.

Please send comments to: webmaster@lac.jci.tju.edu.
All contents copyright ©  2001 Thomas Jefferson University. All rights reserved.