
Forward
Versus Inverse Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Tumors that Surround Critical Normal
Structures
Greg Bednarz, Ph.D., M. Saiful Huq, Ph.D., John W. Sweet, Ph.D., Samuel
Hughes, M.D., Walter J. Curran, Jr., M.D., Pramila Rani Anne, M.D., James M. Galvin, D.Sc.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical
College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107
Conclusions:
It has been shown, for head and neck cases with invaginated targets, that the simple
rule-based forward planning system described here can produce dose distributions with DVHs
that are similar to those obtained with a commercially available inverse system. A major
advantage for the forward technique is the reduction in the number of field segments
required to model the different intensity maps. This decrease simplifies the dose
delivery. A second important advantage is that a significant portion of the dose is
delivered with conformal portals that can be verified using standard port filming methods.
Purpose | Materials
and Methods | Results | Conclusions
Medical Physics Home |
|